Recursively Remove removed all results (when aborted, Canceled).
STR:
Remove [menu item]
Recursively remove all files in a specific folder from the search result
Expand the arrow ->
Expand the arrow -> [again]
Click the ...
[Select folder(s)...] dialog opens -> Cancel
Cancel cancels, but the results list is cleared.
AllDup 4.2.0, WinXP
Recursively Remove removed all results
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 4049
- Joined: 04 Oct 2004, 18:38
- Location: Thailand
- Contact:
Re: Recursively Remove removed all results
I can't reproduce this problem using your step-by-step instruction.
The search result is still the same after i clicked the Cancel button at the "Select folder" dialog...
The search result is still the same after i clicked the Cancel button at the "Select folder" dialog...
Re: Recursively Remove removed all results
I didn't mention, didn't even think of it, particularly...
I was starting with an existing Saved Search, .asr4a.
No time at present, but I'll check to see if that makes a difference...
Yep, that looks to be it.
When starting with a new, regular search, results are maintained.
When starting with Stored Search Results, .as4ra, all results are removed.
OK, & even that is not a given!?.
The particular .asr4a...
only 1 directory tree
tree is a UNC network path (to a NAS)
Maybe the fact that it is a single tree?
So when the arrows expand ->, ->, and ... is then selected, plays into it?
.ini4a:
A "simple" .asr4a that did work:
(All I've got time for, at the moment...)
I was starting with an existing Saved Search, .asr4a.
No time at present, but I'll check to see if that makes a difference...
Yep, that looks to be it.
When starting with a new, regular search, results are maintained.
When starting with Stored Search Results, .as4ra, all results are removed.
OK, & even that is not a given!?.
The particular .asr4a...
only 1 directory tree
tree is a UNC network path (to a NAS)
Maybe the fact that it is a single tree?
So when the arrows expand ->, ->, and ... is then selected, plays into it?
.ini4a:
Code: Select all
[General]
DupCount=2941
DupCountSelected=0
GroupID=3
ContextCount=1
Context1=\\Neil\C\COPY
Tag=File content SHA-1 (160-Bit) (100%)
SearchCriteria=000100000
FilesizeAll=1964979187
FilesizeSelected=0
ListCount=1244
SearchCriteriaDesc=File content SHA-1 (160-Bit) (100%)
Unicode=0
v=405
A "simple" .asr4a that did work:
Code: Select all
[General]
DupCount=4
DupCountSelected=0
GroupID=3
ContextCount=2
Context1=C:\RECYCLER
Context2=C:\USR\STEVEN
Tag=Duplicates: 4 (0%) (1.57 MB)
SearchCriteria=000100000
FilesizeAll=1646570
FilesizeSelected=0
ListCount=2
SearchCriteriaDesc=File content SHA-1 (160-Bit) (100%)
Unicode=0
v=405
Re: Recursively Remove removed all results
Dup'd it with a very simple UNC search.
unc_test.ini4a
unc_test.txt:
base64 encoded unc_test.asr4a (md5 hash of the decoded file, 547d894cfc7967d6f3a0948d0af10c04):
( UUDeview 0.5.20 for Windows (Console) should decode it. Or I imagine some online website too.
uudeview.exe filename)
unc_test.ini4a
Code: Select all
[General]
DupCount=2
DupCountSelected=0
GroupID=3
ContextCount=1
Context1=\\Neil\c\SCANS
Tag=Duplicates: 2 (16%) (53.72 KB)
SearchCriteria=000100000
FilesizeAll=55014
FilesizeSelected=0
ListCount=1
SearchCriteriaDesc=File content SHA-1 (160-Bit) (100%)
Unicode=0
v=405
Code: Select all
03/13/2019 12:30:31 PM - --------------------------------------------------
03/13/2019 12:30:31 PM - AllDup 4.2 PE
03/13/2019 12:30:31 PM - Search Method: File content SHA-1 (160-Bit) (100%)
03/13/2019 12:30:31 PM - Option: Compare files from all source folders
03/13/2019 12:30:31 PM - Folder filter activated: 4
03/13/2019 12:30:31 PM - Determine file count of all source folders...
03/13/2019 12:30:31 PM - File Count: 12
03/13/2019 12:30:31 PM - Scan: \\Neil\c\SCANS
03/13/2019 12:30:31 PM - Found 2 duplicates with a total of 53.72 KB inside folder '\\Neil\c\SCANS'
03/13/2019 12:30:31 PM - Groups: 1
03/13/2019 12:30:31 PM - File Comparison Count: 1
03/13/2019 12:30:31 PM - Checksums created: 2
03/13/2019 12:30:31 PM - Duplicates: 2 (16%) (53.72 KB)
03/13/2019 12:30:31 PM - Elapsed time: 00:00:00
Code: Select all
begin 666 xxx
M1%4[````'``(`!H`5$D%``````#`W-I`"@````<`!0```+#XO0$$````86YZ
M`+#XO0$"``(``-#XO0$%````<VEZ90#0^+T!!0``````P-SJ0`"X&[X!$0``
M`%]?5')E94=R:612;W=$968`N!N^`0```0(```"`X+<!#````%]?1F]R94-O
M;&]R`(#@MP$#````````R/VW`0P```!?7T)A8VM#;VQO<@#(_;<!`P#K^?D`
M`$BQQ@$&````<VEZ94<`2+'&`04``````,#<VD``^(<2!`@```!D=7!N86UE
M`/B'$@0%``````#`W-I````"````"``J`````$,`0P!&`#``.0`R`#``,@`P
M`#$`.`!?`#``,``P`#(`,P`N`'``9`!F```````%``L```!P^+T!!0```'!A
M=&@`</B]`0@`'`````!<`%P`3@!E`&D`;`!<`&,`7`!3`$,`00!.`%,``/#X
MO0$%````9&%T90#P^+T!"``L`````#``.0`O`#(`,``O`#(`,``Q`#@`(``P
M`#$`.@`P`#4`.@`Q`#@`(`!0`$T``'#YO0$&````9&%T944`</F]`0@`+```
M```Q`#(`+P`Q`#@`+P`R`#``,0`X`"``,``S`#H`,0`P`#H`,P`V`"``4`!-
M``"P^;T!!@```&%T='(R`+#YO0$(``(`````00``>(02!`D```!D871E179A
M;`!XA!($!0!P7DT\E#?E0`#XAQ($^(<2!`@`*@````!#`$,`1@`P`#D`,@`P
M`#(`,``Q`#@`7P`P`#``,``R`#,`+@!P`&0`9@``F(T2!`@```!D871E5F%L
M`)B-$@0%`(T$?'-Q+.5``-".$@0$````<6YR`-".$@0#````````.(\2!`<`
M``!A<F-H:78`.(\2!!$```"@CQ($!0```&%T='(`H(\2!`,`(``````(B\H$
M"````'1M<'!A=&@`"(O*!`@```````$````(`#H`````0P!O`'``>0`@`&\`
M9@`@`$,`0P!&`#``.0`R`#``,@`P`#$`.`!?`#``,``P`#(`,P`N`'``9`!F
M```````%``L```!P^+T!</B]`0@`'`````!<`%P`3@!E`&D`;`!<`&,`7`!3
M`$,`00!.`%,``/#XO0'P^+T!"``L`````#``.0`O`#(`,``O`#(`,``Q`#@`
M(``P`#$`.@`P`#4`.@`Q`#@`(`!0`$T``'#YO0%P^;T!"``L`````#``,P`O
M`#$`,P`O`#(`,``Q`#D`(``Q`#(`.@`S`#``.@`P`#D`(`!0`$T``+#YO0&P
M^;T!"``"`````$$``'B$$@1XA!($!0"X'H6K,$+E0`#XAQ($^(<2!`@`.@``
M``!#`&\`<`!Y`"``;P!F`"``0P!#`$8`,``Y`#(`,``R`#``,0`X`%\`,``P
M`#``,@`S`"X`<`!D`&8``)B-$@28C1($!0"-!'QS<2SE0`#0CA($T(X2!`,`
M```````XCQ($.(\2!!$```"@CQ($H(\2!`,`(``````(B\H$"(O*!`@`````
C``$``````8`4N`$'````7U]4<F5E``$`````````````````
`
end
uudeview.exe filename)
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 4049
- Joined: 04 Oct 2004, 18:38
- Location: Thailand
- Contact:
Re: Recursively Remove removed all results
using a unc-path as a source folder will empty the search result when canceling the folder dialog.
this issue will be fixed with the next update.
thank you for your feedback!
this issue will be fixed with the next update.
thank you for your feedback!